tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-350827144131011460.post6257485055950335837..comments2023-06-09T21:14:27.204+01:00Comments on J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog: 7/7 Inquests: The Alleged Identification of Shehzad TanweerThe Antagonisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01459201402366077472noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-350827144131011460.post-29260835622688736142010-11-14T00:03:51.910+00:002010-11-14T00:03:51.910+00:00With regard to Hussain and his family's attemp...With regard to Hussain and his family's attempts to contact him, and also the "tradecraft" mentioned two comments up, according to DS Stuart, who was questioned on 14th October, the men were using 'operational' phones on 7th July 2005. He also stated they had been using these for many weeks leading up until that day, changing the phones and SIMs many times in order to avoid detection. Hussain left his personal phone at home for his brother to find, who discovered Jermaine Lindsay's number listed along with the number of the keyholder of the Alexandra Grove "bomb factory". In Hussain's 'operational' phone, found in the wreckage of the bus, he had put his personal number in the phone book under the contact name "My number". This behaviour isn't very consistent with somebody trying to avoid detection. <br /><br />Curiously, Tanweer's phone was not mentioned by DS Stuart as being recovered from the Aldgate site in the same way that the phones attributed to the other three accused men were.Kierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12236507389155398693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-350827144131011460.post-2584572613840537842010-11-13T20:13:22.926+00:002010-11-13T20:13:22.926+00:00Logically , the presence or otherwise of an 8th fa...Logically , the presence or otherwise of an 8th fatality at Aldgate is a seperate question from whether that 8th person was Tanweer and indeed whether that 8th person was a suicide bomber. Perhaps one approach is to argue independently forward from the evidence rather than focus on the Official Narrative. If we accept the evidence of DI Kemp and DC Meneely that a piece of spine was recovered and that it was clearly not from the 7 identified victims - then there was an 8th person, who needs to be identified. There seems little room for the two policemen to be mistaken about where the spine came from, so if we reject their testimony that implies fabrication (although if you were fabricating testimony about an 8th body , you might perhaps claim to have found rather more of it) . I think Brigit in a previous post questioned the validity of DNA profiling - that would remove the evidence linking the spine to Tanweer, but the spine would still belong to somebody, who could be almost anyone. The disappearence of Tanweer is a genuine issue, and removing him from the scene at Aldgate does not solve that part of the problem. Nobody as far as I know has any evidence for him (or Khan, Hussain or Lindsay) being alive on 8th July 2005 or after so presumably, like Lord Lucan , they are dead. We have independent evidence that Tanweer, Khan, and Hussain were alive on 6th July and intended to go to London. The only evidence for their whereabouts on 7th July comes from the Narrative and all of it seems to be disputed by someone - the only exception is the fact that Hussain's family tried to contact him repeatedly and couldn't. So presumably he was dead by that point? The Narrative could produce no evidence of Lindsay's whereabouts from the point when his wife threw him out some days previously until police evidence put him in the car park at Luton on the morning of 7/7 so strictly speaking, he disappears some days earlier. Whether or not we accept his presence on the Aldgate train (which would not automatically make him a suicide bomber)Tanweer does seem to evaporate on 7/7 if not at Aldgate then somewhere else. The Narrative disposes of the two problems of the 8th body and Tanweer by asserting they are one and the same. If we reject that linkage we then need to explore alternative identities for the 8th body and a scenario for Tanweer's disappearanceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-350827144131011460.post-6047678554009749282010-11-12T01:59:48.876+00:002010-11-12T01:59:48.876+00:00According to The Narrative, the 4 conspirators ca...According to The Narrative, the 4 conspirators carried out what was in effect a military operation with a 100% success rate from start to finish. This implies they were likely very skilled (or less probably, very lucky).<br /><br />Assuming it was their tradecraft that prevailed, it would be contradictory that at least one of the men had apparently informed members of their family (i believe parents?) that the group were travelling to London that day. This apparently childish breach of operational security does not seem consistent with the results of their alleged operation.<br /><br /><br />….also interesting… is Hussain’s family members apparent assertion that he & two others travelled on the previous day, the 6th July. If correct, this might have a bearing on the paucity and quality of CCTV footage so far released. It would be nice to have this confirmed or denied.Flytrap Getawaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-350827144131011460.post-2452636438833334582010-11-11T13:20:48.911+00:002010-11-11T13:20:48.911+00:00That's yet another good question.
Many thanks...That's yet another good question.<br /><br />Many thanks for all your work on this and the J7 site.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com